COVID? Investigative Query Part 2

We listen to the inventor of the PCR test used for COVID, and we break down some of the questions around the PCR test.

In an obscure video resurfaced during the Coronavirus meltdown, Mullis said that “with PCR if you do it well you can find almost anything in anybody. It starts making you believe in the sort of Buddhist notion that everything is contained in everything else, right? Because if you can amplify one single molecule up to something that you can really measure, which PCR can do, then there’s just very few molecules that you don’t have at least one single one of them in your body.”

The PCR test is being used to push positive COVID numbers. We have seen images of positive and negative control tests. EO Sterate is also used on the masks and the tests for sterilization, and is a known cancer causing agent.

The tests themselves also raise serious concerns, as some independant testers have shown the tests leaving behind plastic in peoples bodies. Reports have emerged of infections from these swabs, concerns over the EO Sterate used, and wildest of all, the moving black fibers in masks and tests!

Most disturbingly is the inaccuracy of the tests themselves. As of now, the summary statistic is as follows;

The Conversation – In short, far more people will receive false-positive results than true-positive results.

Depending on the cycle rate of the PCR tests, we see as high as 97{9f37405ed6a01de7502fa952b55b2721bb19e6441e744190e47f0cf9aff69c03} false positives from the tests. Add to this the Positive/Negative tests, concerns about the nanofibers in the tests, and a disturbing picture begins to emerge.

In Ontario, of 4,000 daily positives, only 100? are actual positives. Right now in the third vaccination caused wave, we are seeing 20-30 dead daily. Primarily focused on the masked and vaccinated. With 12 million people now vaccinated, and ZERO contact tracing of the vaccinated by authorities, the pharmaceutical pump and dump is well underway. Pharma elites and the CCP are pushing hard to get that 70{9f37405ed6a01de7502fa952b55b2721bb19e6441e744190e47f0cf9aff69c03} vaccine for herd immunity, having changed the definition of herd immunity from something that is acquired naturally by an immune system to something that is only obtainable through pharmaceuticals.

As we like to say, slaves die, and the pharma money printer goes brrrrrrrrrr.

Meanwhile, Dr. Mengele, aka Bill Gates, gets to run code experiments on DNA instead of computers. Don’t worry my little lemmings, everything will be fine. I promise. Now, let me up the PCR cycle rate so I can lock you down and starve you into submission before rolling out a Universal Basic income and enslaving you to my experiments.

ABSTRACT
An examination of over 80 Covid-19 studies reveals that many relied on assumptions that were false, and which tended to over-estimate the benefits and underestimate the costs of lockdown. As a result, most of the early cost/benefit studies arrived at conclusions that were refuted later by data, and which rendered their cost/benefit findings incorrect. Research done over the past six months has shown that lockdowns have had, at best, a marginal effect on the number of Covid-19 deaths. Generally speaking, the ineffectiveness of lockdown stems from voluntary changes in behavior. Lockdown jurisdictions were not able to prevent noncompliance, and non-lockdown jurisdictions benefited from voluntary changes in behavior that mimicked lockdowns. The limited effectiveness of lockdowns explains why, after one year, the unconditional cumulative deaths per million, and the pattern of daily deaths per million, is not negatively correlated with the stringency of lockdown across countries. Using a cost/benefit method proposed by
Professor Bryan Caplan, and using two extreme assumptions of lockdown effectiveness, the cost/benefit ratio of lockdowns in Canada, in terms of life-years saved, is between 3.6–282. That is, it is possible that lockdown will go down as one of the greatest peacetime policy failures in Canada’s history.